{"id":351353,"date":"2025-05-28T00:55:45","date_gmt":"2025-05-27T22:55:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sauldie.org\/de\/tool-test-kiroi-schritt-2-softwareauswahl-4\/"},"modified":"2025-05-28T00:55:45","modified_gmt":"2025-05-27T22:55:45","slug":"tool-test-kiroi-step-2-software-selection-4","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/risawave.org\/en\/tool-test-kiroi-schritt-2-softwareauswahl-4\/","title":{"rendered":"Tool test in the KIROI step 2: How decision-makers choose AI tools"},"content":{"rendered":"

The path to selecting the optimal digital tools often begins with a well-structured Tool test<\/b>. In the context of the KIROI process, this step plays a central role, particularly in the second step, where companies systematically identify suitable solutions. This is not only about technical features but also about how tools can be integrated into daily work and what concrete benefits they provide. A well-founded Tool test<\/b> supports decision-makers in creating robust foundations for their decisions and effectively driving digital transformation.<\/p>\n

Tool test in KIROI step 2: The structured selection process<\/h2>\n

The selection of suitable digital tools begins with a detailed needs analysis. For example, manufacturing companies examine early warning systems that can detect potential production disruptions early on. Marketing departments, on the other hand, test automation tools for competitor monitoring and campaign optimisation. Office organisation teams rely on tools that integrate seamlessly into existing software landscapes while also meeting data protection requirements.<\/p>\n

The Tool test<\/b> In the KIROI step 2, this is done iteratively: it not only serves to compare functions, but also to assess user-friendliness, scalability, and process compatibility. This ensures that companies are able to derive practical benefits from the selected solutions and that they are sustainable in everyday working life. A manufacturer from the mechanical engineering sector was able to achieve this through a similar approach. Tool test<\/b> to identify a visual quality control system that significantly reduced error rates while simultaneously relieving operators.<\/p>\n

Best Practice: How Companies Implement Targeted Tool Testing<\/h2>\n

Successful decisions begin with clearly defined use cases and cross-functional teams that bring diverse perspectives. This allows a financial services provider, when testing AI-based risk analysis tools, not only to check accuracy but also to ensure integration into existing compliance systems. Likewise, a customer service provider evaluates tools for their user-friendliness in direct dialogue with customers.<\/p>\n

BEST PRACTICE with one customer (name hidden due to NDA contract)<\/b> In a medium-sized logistics company, a planning tool was tested in KIROI step 2. The aim was to optimise supply chains with AI-supported route planning. The targeted tool test not only identified cost savings, but also showed that a certain complexity of the solution reduced practical benefits. The findings flowed directly into the adaptation of the requirements, which ultimately strengthened acceptance among employees.<\/i><\/p>\n

Another important aspect is the documentation of all test results. This is the only way to use findings transparently and comprehensibly for later decisions. Marketing departments use this step to evaluate automation tools in terms of their efficiency in campaigns through realistic live tests. The IT department of a healthcare provider also ensured that data protection and data security were perfectly adhered to before a documentation tool was implemented.<\/p>\n

Key criteria in tool testing evaluation<\/h3>\n

A practice-oriented selection takes into account, in addition to the technical features, in particular:<\/p>\n